• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

World Cup 02: Probably some of the rudest teams ever at this one

D

danger zone

Reserve Team
I feel that the WC is far too overblown. 32 teams is way too much. There really is no place for farts like Senegal,China, Ecuador no matter if they qualified. There should only be sixteen to 24 teams max. No way should Korea and Japan be seeded, hosts or not, while England get the bum deal in return. The quality of football suffers with all these sides. That is why the last world cup was so bad. Even if the world cups of 82, 86 and 90 were good it was never the same after 78. Football doesn't need five African teams. Lets face it South Africa Cameroon etc will never be a force. Just like the Asians and American sides. It is a joke that Holland are not there at the expense of some joke of an African team. Just 16 it should be. Then you would get the best. I mean remember this; Brazil ,Turkey, Costa Rica and China. The worst group ever.
 
M

Mauricio

El Gran DT
Re: World Cup 02: Probably some of the rudest teams ever at this one

Originally posted by danger zone
I feel that the WC is far too overblown. 32 teams is way too much. There really is no place for farts like Senegal,China, Ecuador no matter if they qualified. There should only be sixteen to 24 teams max. No way should Korea and Japan be seeded, hosts or not, while England get the bum deal in return. The quality of football suffers with all these sides. That is why the last world cup was so bad. Even if the world cups of 82, 86 and 90 were good it was never the same after 78. Football doesn't need five African teams. Lets face it South Africa Cameroon etc will never be a force. Just like the Asians and American sides. It is a joke that Holland are not there at the expense of some joke of an African team. Just 16 it should be. Then you would get the best. I mean remember this; Brazil ,Turkey, Costa Rica and China. The worst group ever.
Click to expand...

Then FIFA must change the name just america an europe cup; dont be silly mate, if u want a true competition let little countries grow, because if they dont participate in WC thell never grow and watching the same teams winning all the time 4 ever it will turn to be boring dont u think?

And if little contries grow, the WC is going to be a very intresting and entertainig competition.
 
D

danger zone

Reserve Team
I know what you mean, I do. But th World Cup doesn't need more substandard sides. I know it's fun to see how they will fare though. But it just comes down to money and greed with all the extra sides with FIFA wanting more cash. Hell in ten years there will be fifty teams. I feel the WC should be elite. I dont want to watch crap like China vs Costa Rica. Just like Japan vs Jamaica from 98. All the groups should have an Argentina vs England. With sixteen tems there would be. More quality, less teams.
 
S

Sweden Boy

Senior Squad
16 teams???'thats not quality so 9it will be something like this


8 UEFA
3 CONMEBOL
1CONCACAF
1/2 AFC
2 CAF
0/1 OFC
 
D

danger zone

Reserve Team
It is funny that in 68 years of World Cups that only seven teams have won it right? So I guess we are used to the same old teams. Because they always prove to be the best.
 
K

KADER

Guest
Re: World Cup 02: Probably some of the rudest teams ever at this one

Originally posted by danger zone
I feel that the WC is far too overblown. 32 teams is way too much. There really is no place for farts like Senegal,China, Ecuador no matter if they qualified. There should only be sixteen to 24 teams max. No way should Korea and Japan be seeded, hosts or not, while England get the bum deal in return. The quality of football suffers with all these sides. That is why the last world cup was so bad. Even if the world cups of 82, 86 and 90 were good it was never the same after 78. Football doesn't need five African teams. Lets face it South Africa Cameroon etc will never be a force. Just like the Asians and American sides. It is a joke that Holland are not there at the expense of some joke of an African team. Just 16 it should be. Then you would get the best. I mean remember this; Brazil ,Turkey, Costa Rica and China. The worst group ever.
Click to expand...

Dumbest thing I ever heard on this forum! (as dumb as Van Wikj :p ). How can you compare any country to a fart? Senegal? That team can surpirise some people during WC.
Can u read?
It's called W-O-R-L-D Cup-countries from all over the world! Not just Europe and South America. Footbal doesn't need five African teams? That sounds racist. Maybe some people like to watch African teams? People from all over the world should enjoy it.

Plus, if u don't want to watch fart teams-who tells u to watch World Cup? U can watch 1902837th episode of Cambio Dolore, or whatever it is called.
 
M

Mauricio

El Gran DT
Originally posted by danger zone
I know what you mean, I do. But th World Cup doesn't need more substandard sides. I know it's fun to see how they will fare though. But it just comes down to money and greed with all the extra sides with FIFA wanting more cash. Hell in ten years there will be fifty teams. I feel the WC should be elite. I dont want to watch crap like China vs Costa Rica. Just like Japan vs Jamaica from 98. All the groups should have an Argentina vs England. With sixteen tems there would be. More quality, less teams.
Click to expand...

Belive me let them grow, imagine America-European Cup 2002, it doesnt sounds fair

and remember thre are scon, and semis round
 
D

danger zone

Reserve Team
My opinion.Brian Glanville agrees:
'Should a World Cup be, as surley was first intended, for the best in the world, or for the world and his wife?:the Jamaicas and their likes? Since Havelange's coup it was too plain the way a great competition was going: or had gone."
True words.
 
M

Mauricio

El Gran DT
Peoplr that make that type of comments osent know about football
like that guy of CONMEBOL that said that CONCACAF was another continent
 
D

danger zone

Reserve Team
Glanville is one of the greatest football journalists ever. He's been around since the fifties. Seen it all. He knows a bit ore than you and me.
 
S

Sweden Boy

Senior Squad
Originally posted by danger zone
Glanville is one of the greatest football journalists ever. He's been around since the fifties. Seen it all. He knows a bit ore than you and me.
Click to expand...


This is the first time I heard about him:confused:
The best narrator Luis Omar Tapia
 
S

Sweden Boy

Senior Squad
Originally posted by ZePenguin
Mexico can't follow the best european sides :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


They cant be at the level of the top European countrys like France or Italy but thy r at the level of Russia or Belgium
 
M

Mauricio

El Gran DT
Originally posted by Sweden Boy



They cant be at the level of the top European countrys like France or Italy but thy r at the level of Russia or Belgium
Click to expand...

of course just look back at WC94 and 98
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Top