This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Mus;2772683 said:the attacking player also has the benefit of the doubt
How was the call incorrect? The pass is sweet but I understand the call.Xifio;2773829 said:it comfortably makes it to Seydou Keita ... but then the ref incorrectly blows for high foot ...
don't get me wrong, I can see why the ref gave the decision; the foot was high, no doubt ... but I question if this was dangerous play ...Sevillista;2774089 said:How was the call incorrect? The pass is sweet but I understand the call.
Xifio;2774116 said:don't get me wrong, I can see why the ref gave the decision; the foot was high, no doubt ... but I question if this was dangerous play ...
I felt Zlatan's superlative reach allowed him to be in total control of the ball the whole way through, and it wasn't a case of him contesting a 50-50 challenge for the ball against the defenders ...
the defenders did not appear to be going in for a challenge with their heads either, which would have made it dangerous play ... arguably, they didn't go in because it would have been putting themselves danger, but that is similar to not going in for a 50-50 tackle on the ground and allowing an opposing player free reign to completely get the ball ...
it looks to me like this incident falls under the same grey area as overhead bicycle kicks ... I've seen calls go both ways, at the discretion of the referee ...
if there is a clear-cut definition in the rule books -- regarding the minimum distance a defender must be from a player raising his foot high, etc. -- then let me know, coz I am going on my understanding of the rule, but have not looked the specifics up ...