ShiftyPowers;3366914 said:
Disagree with this entire post. I certainly can't always get an automatic rifle "with bodies on it" and I doubt any of these white suburban criminals could either. The Columbine kids had contacts like that, really?
take a trip to milwaukee not dressed like your preppy self and see if you cannot get your hands on a gun.
fact is you can get any gun anywhere, anytime, i know plenty of white suburban kids and black too with guns picked up off the streets for cheap.
suburban means nothing anymore, the "hood" is so "cool" nowadays it is everywhere you look, it is looked at by the younger generations as the place to be and everybody is a gangster.
who knows what the columbine kids had, but denver is not far from them and if you think you cannot get a gun out there you are mistaken.
Alex;3367004 said:
RC that post is ridiculous. There should NEVER be a need to carry a firearm to protect yourself. This is where the USA has it wrong.
We allow people to have guns in Australia, if they hunt, or do it for sport. As soon as people are carrying them for self defence, you're suggesting shooting people is an answer. It's never the answer, and more guns in the hands of people for that reason, means more people will die at the hands of firearms.
self defense meant in their household in case of burglary, etc.
i never said shooting people is the answer, but if you break into my home at 3 in the morning i am not going to heat us up a pot of tea and attempt to talk it out on my couch.
my point was laws besides a life for a life is the only way, if they end up killing themselves so be it, whether he takes his own or he is executed, etc better the lunatic is gone than alive in a prison.
and places around where i grew up people kill over everything, a gun is needed for self defense.
opinions of whether or not we think they are needed does not matter, try telling those who live in those places a gun is not needed, not everyone lives in a wonderful neighborhood with wonderful neighbors.