This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
andy said:Its not about giving foul kicks, its about playing hard...see you don't understand what an Argentina Brasil rivarly means because probably you aren't Brasilian or Argentinean. With that in itself, you should not talk....Whenever Brasil and Argentina plays, it is like a final, and players lay everything out there to win, and sometimes that includes playing rough. And about Mexico, they were not better suited for Brasil since they did not make it to the finals, that already shows that Argentina was the best team to play against Brasil, not Mexico....
Btw: there is never a last laugh, unless one of these nations ceases to disappear, because both will continue to duke it out. And yes, now we are tied in Conferation Cup wins...
big al said:well playing hard is one thing ; and playing dirty is another ; i waht aregentina were doing was playing dirty ; and like i said i this is not the fisrt time ; with brazil,mexico, cuba , whatever; i seen a lot of argentina games ; and thats there style when losing bad; you beeing argentine wont or dont wanna see those things; and waht that hell beeing brazilian or argentine has to do with anything in the first place ; i saw the same game as you ;on the other hand i think you beeing argertine are the least to have and objective opinion; and about argentina beeing best team to play brazil ; i could give a rats arse i f they were the best or worst; tha wasnt the point; i just mention that mexico could giving a better fight ; meaning gameplay, tactics etc.. ;
plus i seen alot of posts mentioning that argentina lost cause of the 2 quick goals and argentina had mentally gone down; well to this i have to only one thing to say; if argentina are to ever to win again a world cup they really need to prepare ther selfs to comeback from results; they have done it dozens of times so dont think it as an a excuse; this is why thay havent won a wolr cup in many years; it doesnt matter if you have 20 stars in your squad if you dont prepare your self mentally first to win or even lose; mexico have the same problem thats why they cant get the results sometimes.
Luis Ah-Hoy said:Pekerman should have taken out Figueroa at the first minutes of the second half... but anyway, well deserved win for Brasil...
El Diablo Rojo said:Yes that's true, that's why probably some don't consider this a rematch for the eliminatories, actually it was something different, and the players wanted to play against Argentina for what it represented a final vs. Argentina a plain rematch for the WCQ match, 'cuz at any rate that one was a rematch for Argentina for what happened in Brazil in 2004.
andy said:Btw: there is never a last laugh, unless one of these nations ceases to disappear, because both will continue to duke it out. And yes, now we are tied in Conferation Cup wins...
andy said:For some reason Figueroa does not convince me, but thank god we have Crespo at least...
Grunger said:I thought it was the first time we played you in the Confederation Cup. If you're meaning titles, correct me if i'm wrong, but you won it in 1992, and we won in 1997 (Saudi Arabia) and 2005.
andy said:I read in an Argentine paper, La Nacion, that both teams are tied...They both won 34 times, and tied 22, for a total of 90 games...
andy said:Btw: there is never a last laugh, unless one of these nations ceases to disappear, because both will continue to duke it out. And yes, now we are tied in Conferation Cup wins...
Grunger said:You mean in matches played between both teams in overall history then. In your post you said "We are tied in Confederation Cup wins".
There.
Kristian said:Cicinho would be the bollox at Arsenal.
andy said:yes, I mean in history, of course...