FIFA gets 6/10 at Soccer Gaming review.

[::shinji::]

I'm gonna support Joe with his review...if anything I think a 5/10 is being generous. Once you look past all the glitter, Fifa2003's gameplay is extremely shallow...

 

[Matt Holme]

I'm not saying Joe can't have his opinion. Of course he can. He can say its a 1/10 for all I care.

What I'm saying is that Soccer Gaming is my website, and therefore it is up to me as to what "my site" gives FIFA 2003. People won't be saying "hey look, JOE LEMON gave FIFA 2003 5/10". They will be saying "hey look, SOCCER GAMING gave FIFA 2003 5/10". That is what I don't want happening because I don't agree that FIFA 2003 deserves a 5/10.

But for everyone who does agree, that is fine. I'm not trying to make you change your opinion.

At the end of the day, the person who owns and runs the website obviously gets to decide what is put on his website.

Just like if Joe had his own website, I wouldn't be able to tell him what to put on there.

 

[Swerve]

That explanation is fine, but if that is the only problem just change the name of the thread if at all possible W/O taking it down.

 

[Matt Holme]

This thread is fine, I'm not considering taking it down or changing it in anyway.

What I'm talking about is having the acutal review posted at www.soccergaming.com. Because the review doesn't just represent Joe, but all of Soccer Gaming, the score will have to be changed.

 

[OB1]

You cannot chamge a mans review score because you don't agree with it. Just because he posted on here doesn't give you the right to alter to suit your taste.

If its such a problem, why don't you create a thread at the top of the page stating Soccergamings review for Fifa 2003. This way people can see what you think of the game.

 

[KaseyKeller]

Matt isn't saying he has a problem with this thread or Joe's review being posted in the forums. He is simply stating that a review on this site (outside of the forums) will be based on the opinion of soccer gaming as a whole rather than just joe's opinion.

 

[The_Unforgiven]

OMG this review is lame...0/10 control? You are a funny guy, i hope this will be your last review ever because this is a joke.

0/10 LOL....

 

[Paul]

Originally posted by Matt Holme

Grassy, Joe isn't anti-FIFA, he just likes making controversy. He knows perfectly well that I wouldn't post a review that gave FIFA 2003 5/10, he just wanted to start something.

just kidding min

Matt's quite a diptomat ... Matt for um ... President or PM

On what Matt is saying ... I sorta agree ...

If your gonna have a Review of a game that is going to represent a big website, its gotta be fair and accurate

 

[sip]

IMO:

Graphics: 6/10
Sound: 8/10
Gameplay: 5/10
Controls: 4/10

Hmmmm

 

[OB1]

I will give it...

Graphics 9/10
Sound 7/10
Gameplay 3/10
Controls 3/10

 

[GuileSN]

I think it is

Graphics : 8.5 / 10
Sound : 8 / 10
Gameplay : 4 / 10
Controls : 4 / 10

 

[valioso]

I used to think soccergaming was an alright site to get reviews, now I see is not the case, Matt I think you just lost a lot of people's respect in your site and your reviews, since is not a reliable source of information.

 

[valioso]

in other news, I think Joe is just pissed because you can not play this game the same way you have been playing the last few years

 

[Joe]

Originally posted by The_Unforgiven
OMG this review is lame...0/10 control? You are a funny guy, i hope this will be your last review ever because this is a joke.

0/10 LOL....

No. Giving the game high scores just to get on the website like previous years is a joke.

I think OB1 has the review numbers right.

 

[saurabh]

Its useless talking all that.I really think review wasnt right but at end of day we can only have our opinion but decision lies on owner.So i think we all should not have any fights like thing.


But i am pissed of this review.SG are a big site but a review like that is too bad.Joe aim is only to have some controversial thing.

 

[Joe]

Originally posted by saurabh

But i am pissed of this review.SG are a big site but a review like that is too bad.Joe aim is only to have some controversial thing.

Uh, stop copying Matt's words, and no it isn't. Why would I care if I had something contreversial at a Soccer Gaming website? I used to care, but I'm here to inform. I've already told people about my opinion on the game and they are not going to buy it. I told them honest truth--the facts, the problems with the game. But I also told them the improvements, but they felt the negatives outweighed the positives.

 

[HydroElectric]

Soccer gaming reviews are biased mother****ers.

 

[SkylineGTR34]

That so called review dont mean ****, some druggie prolly reviewed the game while doing some heroin.
Every PC magazine I read gave it 9.0 and up, no one gave less then 9, some even said its alot better then the WE/PES 2 (and I totally agree)

 

[Joe]

Originally posted by SkylineGTR34
That so called review dont mean ****, some druggie prolly reviewed the game while doing some heroin.
Every PC magazine I read gave it 9.0 and up, no one gave less then 9, some even said its alot better then the WE/PES 2 (and I totally agree)

What review are you talking about? After playing it more, losing and winning I'm liking it more, but it will get no more than a 7, no less than a 5. It's an average game. That's all there is to say.

 

[SkylineGTR34]

Originally posted by Joe
What review are you talking about? After playing it more, losing and winning I'm liking it more, but it will get no more than a 7, no less than a 5. It's an average game. That's all there is to say.

Ill give it atleast 9, everything is perfect (except few bugs that dont really bother me)

Audio - 9.0
Graphics - 9.5
Gameplay - 9.0
Controls - 8.5

I love this game, best soccer game yet!